About the author: researches and teaches courses on nineteenth-century British literature, intellectual history, and cultural studies at 黑料吃瓜网.
Dystopian fiction seems so alluring during the coronavirus pandemic. As we eagerly await a return to normalcy, many say 鈥� whether we are talking about or . What does especially well is to show how we can do more than simply repeat.
Steven Spielberg鈥檚 (2018), an adaptation of of the same title (2011), is a case in point. Set in 2045 in the city of Columbus, Ohio, it speaks of a world that has weathered corn syrup droughts and bandit riots.
People have now resorted to outliving rather than fixing the world鈥檚 problems. Accordingly, a virtual reality game known as the OASIS has become a refuge for many, including the central protagonist Wade Watts (Tye Sheridan).
Small wonder that the OASIS is so appealing. Within its walls, Spielberg pays homage to many aspects of popular culture. The video game Minecraft (2009) is a possible setting, and throughout the film, viewers watch , and in battle.
Refuge of virtual reality
Entire plot sequences incorporate existing popular characters, music and stories. In a nod to Superman, Watts dons Clark Kent glasses to conceal his identity. And in a sequence worthy of the film鈥檚 , Watts and his romantic interest Samantha Cook (Olivia Cooke) dance to the Bee Gees鈥� 鈥淪tayin鈥� Alive鈥� (1977).
The central conflict in Ready Player One arises when James Halliday (Mark Rylance), one of the OASIS鈥檚 creators, dies and leaves behind a seemingly impossible quest. The prize is his extensive fortune and total control over the OASIS. Watts鈥� competitors include the Innovative Online Industries (IOI), a loyalty centre that seeks to take over the OASIS.
The IOI is shown to be exploitative. Samantha鈥檚 father, we learn, borrowed gaming gear, built up debt and moved into the IOI in hopes to repay it, only to fall ill and die. Samantha stands to follow his example and her debt has already exceeded 23,000 credits.
Inequalities
What distinguishes the film 鈥� and its source material 鈥� is its exploration of how we negotiate with a social order rife with inequalities. This theme is particularly timely: COVID-19 has made apparent, for instance, the links between .
, the IOI鈥檚 corporate police arrest Wade, and he is marshalled out of his apartment complex and into a transport truck. As the vehicle moves, he peers out of its window and absorbs the changes that have befallen the world:
鈥� still covered everything in sight 鈥�. The number of homeless people seemed to have increased drastically. Tents and cardboard shelters lined the streets, and the public parks I saw seemed to have been converted into refugee camps.鈥�
The key term here is neglect. Wade is not alone in having forsaken the world. The virtual universe of the OASIS may have provided a convenient refuge. But choosing to escape the world鈥檚 realities has contributed to a dramatic rise in social and economic inequalities.
Taking constructive steps
Both Cline鈥檚 novel and Spielberg鈥檚 film trace Watts鈥� growth into a better global citizen and his reconnection to the real world, so that his triumph can entail more than the regeneration of a flawed system. Spielberg expands on the novel by exploring what Watts does with his new-found wealth and power.
Watts shares his gains with his friends and together they take constructive steps towards improving both the OASIS and the wider world: they employ Halliday鈥檚 friend Ogden (Simon Pegg) as a non-exclusive consultant. They also ban loyalty centres from accessing the OASIS and switch off the virtual world on Tuesdays and Thursdays to encourage people to spend more time in the real world.
All of these actions seem commendable and they reveal how different Watts and his friends are to Halliday. Yet the film also exposes paradoxes inherent in fixing a broken system with its very tools.
In a recent article on the novel that I wrote with James Munday, a mathematics and statistics undergraduate student, we argue that any major : their power is contingent upon the OASIS after all. But Wade seeks a more selfless and heroic win: creating a system that answers the needs of the many.
Imagining new worlds
What Spielberg does especially well is to show the importance of imagining the world in new ways 鈥� and the temptation and problems with rebuilding a broken one in its own image.
In this, Spielberg harks back to a long genealogy of dystopian fiction, a genre invested in world building. The problems that Watts faces are anticipated, for instance, in George Orwell鈥檚 (1945), where we find an exploitative social system replaced by one even more so because it is more efficient.
Recently, Gregory Claeys provided us with an interdisciplinary map of the genre in his illuminating study . In a , he draws connections between the fears that we feel in these times of uncertainty to the genre鈥檚 central concerns.
As we collectively meditate on the world鈥檚 problems, why not imagine better worlds?
which features includes relevant and informed articles written by researchers and academics in their areas of expertise and edited by experienced journalists.
黑料吃瓜网 is a founding partner of The Conversation Canada, an online media outlet providing independent, high-quality explanatory journalism. Originally established in Australia in 2011, it has had more than 85 commissioning editors and 30,000-plus academics register as contributors. A full list of articles written by 黑料吃瓜网academics can be found on聽